Multifactorial
Combinations
Joseph
McLean
We have seen elsewhere that combining factorial,
defactorial (that is, multifactorial
with step 2) and primorials, that we can create sequences
of numbers with built-in sieves. Let us take this process a step further, and
consider multifactorial combinations in a more
general way. I will refer to multifactorials with
gap/step/degree/subscript of size n to be of modulus n, for reasons that should
become apparent. Note that multifactorials n!m with odd modulus m are always
even for all n>m, whereas when m is odd, the parity of n!m
is the same as that if n itself.
Odd primes are equivalent to either 1 or 3 mod
4. Hence, if n is an odd number, then n!4 and (n-2)!4 contain
between them all primes up to n. We then consider the construction n!4±(n-2)!4±1. This has a
built-in sieve, with exceptions arising when a prime p, which is contained
explicitly in one of the multifactorials, say n!4, also divides (n-2)!4±1. This occurs
comparatively rarely. We also consider even n, where the built-in sieve acts in
the same overall fashion, though slightly weaker. Throughout this article, I
list only those values that have at least 10000 digits.
11419!4+11417!4+1 |
|
|
|
10346 |
|
|
|
11488!4-11486!4-1 |
10416 |
12259!4+12257!4+1 |
|
|
|
11202 |
|
14034!4+14032!4-1 |
|
|
13029 |
14403!4+14401!4+1 |
|
|
|
13413 |
|
|
|
15691!4-15689!4-1 |
14758 |
|
15962!4+15960!4-1 |
|
|
15042 |
|
|
|
16059!4-16057!4-1 |
15144 |
|
|
16079!4-16077!4+1 |
|
15165 |
|
18001!4+17999!4-1 |
|
|
17198 |
|
|
18456!4-18454!4+1 |
|
17683 |
|
19875!4+19873!4-1 |
|
|
19202 |
|
|
20207!4-20205!4+1 |
|
19559 |
|
|
20499!4-20497!4+1 |
|
19874 |
|
|
22078!4−22076!4+1 |
|
21582 |
22635!4+22633!4+1 |
|
|
|
22188 |
22665!4+22663!4+1 |
|
|
|
22220 |
|
|
23399!4−23397!4+1 |
|
23021 |
23435!4+23433!4+1 |
|
|
|
23060 |
|
23969!4+23967!4−1 |
|
|
23644 |
|
|
26345!4−26343!4+1 |
|
26258 |
26997!4+26995!4+1 |
|
|
|
26980 |
|
|
|
27282!4−27280!4−1 |
27296 |
|
28257!4+28255!4−1 |
|
|
28379 |
|
|
|
28385!4−28383!4−1 |
28521 |
In terms of divisibility properties, there is a lot
of symmetry, for instance if a prime p£n-4 divides
n!4+(n-2)!4+1
where n is odd, and pºnmod4,
then since p must divide n!4 and (n-4)!4,
p must also divide (n-2)!4+1,
and so p divides n!4-(n-2)!4-1, (n-2)!4+(n-4)!4+! and (n-2)!4-(n-4)!4+1. A
similar set occurs if p divides n!4+(n-2)!4-1. Another
similar symmetrical divisibility occurs when n is even, but the restriction on
p is tighter, so that p£(n-4)/2. In the
event that p=n/2, obviously in the even n case only, then the second pair of
divisions fail, but the first two remain.
In fact, all the numbers in the above two tables
are prime, since the form is easily handled by BLS, but we shall see forms
using mod 4 later below for which BLS cannot be applied successfully.
The combinations mod 4 obviously rise in value
at a slower rate than the mod 2 defactos, meaning
that we have to do a lot more searching to higher values of n to find any
probable primes of significant size. It makes sense therefore to consider next
the possibility of using mod 3 multifactorials.
Let us first consider divisibility on n!3±1,
which for n>3 is always odd. If nº0mod3,
this is never divisible by 3, and has a built-in sieve of other primes up to
n/3. If nº1mod3
then n!3º1mod3
and so n!3-1
is always divisible by 3. If nº2mod3
then n!3 alternates between 2 and 1 mod 3, so either
one of n!3+1 or n!3-1
is divisible by 3, but not both at the same time obviously. Hence over a
repetitive cycle of three consecutive integers, giving six numbers for testing,
there are 2 of the 6 are divisible by 3.
All primes apart from 3 are equivalent to either
1 or 2 mod 3. Hence if nº2mod3,
n!3 and (n-1)!3
involve every prime except 3. Since n!3 is even for
all n>3 (even or odd), we consider the construct n!3±(n-1)!3±1. If n is even
and nº2mod3, then n!3º-1mod3. Since (n-1)!º1mod3, the
combination n!3-(n-1)!3-1 is divisible
by 3. If n is odd and nº2mod3,
then similarly, the combination n!3+(n-1)!3+1 is
divisible by 3. In searching, we let n run through all positive integers.
Suppose n is equivalent to either 1 or 0 mod 3. Then out of the four possible
combinations, two of them will be divisible by 3. In total, over a repetitive
cycle of six integers, giving 24 possible combinations, 5 out of every 12 will
therefore be divisible by 3. Although this figure is poorer than for n!3±1, the built-in
sieve is tighter, as depending on the circumstances, primes larger than n/3 can
divide both multifactorials and so cannot divide the
combination. Again I only list those with at least 10000 digits.
|
9131!3+9130!3-1 |
|
|
10735 |
9612!3+9611!3+1 |
|
|
|
11372 |
|
11111!3+11110!3-1 |
|
|
13378 |
11562!3+11561!3+1 |
|
|
|
13988 |
|
12116!3+12115!3-1 |
|
|
14740 |
|
12530!3+12529!3-1 |
|
|
15305 |
|
|
12759!3-12758!3+1 |
|
15618 |
|
|
13037!3-13036!3+1 |
|
15999 |
Needless to say, many divisibility properties
can be identified here, where if (n-1)/3<p<n-1, then if p
divides one of the possibles, it will also divide certain
others, the exact occurrences depending on the different values of p and n mod
3 at any time. A similar set of divisibility properties arises if we replace
the n-1 item with n-2, as follows.
|
|
|
9274!3-(9274-2)!3-1 |
10924 |
|
10736!3+10734!3-1 |
|
|
12874 |
|
11338!3+11336!3-1 |
|
|
13685 |
|
12799!3+12797!3-1 |
|
|
15672 |
|
|
13775!3-13773!3+1 |
|
17014 |
|
|
|
14881!3-14879!3-1 |
18546 |
All of these mod 3 forms succumb to BLS, so that
all values are in fact prime. However, if we replace
the deviation ±1
by ±3, we obtain
values that cannot be handled by BLS and so remain probable primes. I present
probable primes in order for n-1
and n-2.
|
|
8662!3-8661!3+3 |
|
10118 |
9719!3+9718!3+3 |
|
|
|
11514 |
|
|
10096!3-10095!3+3 |
|
12016 |
|
10299!3+10298!3-3 |
|
|
12288 |
12886!3+12885!3+3 |
|
|
|
15791 |
|
|
|
13244!3-13243!3-3 |
16283 |
13354!3+13353!3+3 |
|
|
|
16434 |
|
13413!3+13412!3-3 |
|
|
16515 |
|
13737!3+13736!3-3 |
|
|
16962 |
14053!3+14052!3+3 |
|
|
|
17398 |
|
|
14523!3-14522!3+3 |
|
18049 |
|
|
|
16044!3-(16044-1)!3-3 |
|
|
17728!3+(17728-1)!3-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18681!3−(18680)!3−3 |
|
&
8643!3+8641!3+3 |
|
|
|
10093 |
8753!3+8751!3+3 |
|
|
|
10237 |
|
|
|
9010!3-9008!3-3 |
10576 |
|
|
|
10488!3-10486!3-3 |
12541 |
|
|
10791!3-10789!3+3 |
|
12947 |
|
|
|
10948!3-10946!3-3 |
13159 |
|
|
|
11696!3-11694!3-3 |
14169 |
|
|
11771!3-11769!3+3 |
|
14271 |
|
|
|
12636!3-12634!3-3 |
15449 |
|
14208!3+14206!3-3 |
|
|
17612 |
|
|
|
16760!3−16758!3−3 |
21176 |
|
|
16889!3−16887!3+3 |
|
21358 |
|
|
|
17112!3−17110!3−3 |
21672 |
17809!3+17807!3+3 |
|
|
|
22658 |
|
|
|
18328!3−18326!3−3 |
23394 |
|
|
21927!3−21925!3+3 |
|
28557 |
The above constructs using tri-factorials lose 5
out of every 12 possibles to divisibility by 3.
However, if we consider the more general form n!3±(n-1)!3±(n-2)!3±1, then every
prime p>3 is directly involved in one of the multifactorials,
and we can cut down the failure rate to 2 out of every 8 possibles.
Primes proliferate, and I give only the largest found.
8348!3+(8348-1)!3+(8348-2)!3+1 |
9707 |
8389!3+(8389-1)!3-(8389-2)!3-1 |
9760 |
8879!3-(8879-1)!3+(8879-2)!3-1 |
10403 |
Divisibility by 3 occurs as follows: If nº0mod3, n!3º0mod3,
if nº1mod3, n!3º1mod3 and if nº2mod3, n!3
alternates in sign. One of the 3 multifactorials is always
divisible by 3, that is, 0mod3. We require the three non-zero items to align so
that they are all negative or all positive. In the above case, this happens as
follows:
When n º
0 mod 3 and n is even, then we require the signs to be +,+,+
or -,-,-
When n º
0 mod 3 and n is odd, then we require the signs to be +,-,- or -,+,+
When n º
1 mod 3 and n is even, then we require the signs to be +,-,+
or -,-,+
When n º
1 mod 3 and n is odd, then we require the signs to be +,+,+
or -,+,+
When n º
2 mod 3 and n is even, then we require the signs to be -,+,- or -,-,-
When n º
2 mod 3 and n is odd, then we require the signs to be +,+,+
or +,-,+
We have just considered combinations based on 0,
1 and 2 as being three numbers producing three different modulii
mod 3. However, we may just as well consider any other set involving 0, for
example 0, 2 and 4, giving the general form n!3±(n-2)!3±(n-4)!3±1, which acts
almost identically to the previous one.
7928!3+(7928-2)!3-(7928-4)!3+1 |
9159 |
8035!3+(8035-2)!3-(8035-4)!3-1 |
9298 |
8671!3+(8671-2)!3-(8671-4)!3-1 |
10130 |
Divisibility by 3 still occurs in 2 out of every
8 possibles, with slightly differing sign patterns.
Obviously we could get bogged down considering every possible triple, with diminishing
returns. However, I have focussed on the {0, 2, 4} combination for a particular
reason, as will be seen soon. Other triples that perform similarly include {0,
1, 5}, {0, 4, 5}, {0, 2, 7}, etc.
The next logical step is to consider mod 5 multifactorials. However, since all primes except 5 are
equivalent to 1, 2, 3 or 4 mod 5, the number of combinations gets too high. I
am only interested in going to at most three signs (i.e. four items) in any
single combination, so mod 5, and for that matter mod 8, multifactorial
combinations are not considered in their fullest form, although I will come
back to a limited version of the mod 5 case later.
In general, the Chinese Remainder Theorem
guarantees that for all primes p for which mp£n
and p does not divide m, then p divides n!m,
and so any combination involving multifactorials of
the same modulus and ±1
or ±2 (to ensure
that the overall combination is always odd) is automatically sieved to n/m,
except for when p divides m, for example when m is 3, 5, 6, etc, in which case
certain combinations will result in divisibility by p.
For completeness, let us return to the mod 2
case. I have already considered the straightforward case n!2±2 for n odd.
However, it would be nice to have a symmetric version that can be used when n
is even. Since n is 0 or 1 mod 2, n occurs in either n!2
or (n-1)!2. Since if
one of these is even, the other must be odd, this leads us to the formula n!2±(n-1)!2±2.
|
|
|
6403!2-(6403-1)!2-2 |
10798 |
|
|
|
7386!2-(7386-1)!2-2 |
12685 |
7959!2+(7959-1)!2+2 |
|
|
|
13798 |
|
|
|
8381!2-(8381-1)!2-2 |
14623 |
|
9273!2+(9273-1)!2-2 |
|
|
16383 |
|
|
|
10262!2-10261!2-2 |
18356 |
|
|
10398!2-10397!2+2 |
|
18629 |
|
11411!2+11410!2-2 |
|
|
20674 |
|
|
12974!2−12973!2+2 |
|
23867 |
|
|
|
15366!2−15365!2−2 |
28832 |
16761!2+16760!2+2 |
|
|
|
31765 |
|
17413!2+17412!2−2 |
|
|
33145 |
|
18924!2+18923!2−2 |
|
|
36363 |
20012!2+20011!2+2 |
|
|
|
38696 |
|
|
20099!2−20098!2+2 |
|
38883 |
Since we now have a standard form of n!2±(n-1)!2±2 for the mod 2
case, we stretch this for mod 4 and mod 6 respectively, and then stretch the
mod 3 standard form n!3±(n-1)!3 to
consider our first mod 5 case.
|
|
|
11753!4-11752!4-2 |
10686 |
|
|
|
12855!4-12854!4-2 |
11813 |
|
|
|
12961!4-12960!4-2 |
11921 |
|
|
|
13881!4-13880!4-2 |
12871 |
|
14213!4+14212!4-2 |
|
|
13215 |
|
15840!4+15839!4-2 |
|
|
14914 |
16426!4+16425!4+2 |
|
|
|
15530 |
17292!4+17291!4+2 |
|
|
|
16445 |
|
|
18347!4-18346!4+2 |
|
17567 |
|
|
20704!4-20703!4+2 |
|
20095 |
|
|
|
20787!4-20786!4-2 |
20184 |
21176!4+21175!4+2 |
|
|
|
20605 |
|
22363!4+22362!4−2 |
|
|
21892 |
|
|
22535!4−22534!4+2 |
|
22079 |
26249!4+26248!4+2 |
|
|
|
26152 |
|
|
28373!4−28372!4+2 |
|
28508 |
|
|
30309!4−30308!4+2 |
|
30670 |
|
|
|
31145!4−31144!4−2 |
31608 |
|
31236!4+31235!4−2 |
|
|
31710 |
|
|
31326!4−31325!4+2 |
|
31811 |
|
31334!4+31333!4−2 |
|
|
31820 |
|
|
31551!4−31550!4+2 |
|
32064 |
|
|
31968!4−31967!4+2 |
|
32534 |
|
|
|
32157!4−32156!4−2 |
32746 |
The n-1
term here can be replaced by n-3
with similar results, as follows.
|
11161!4+11158!4-2 |
|
|
10085 |
|
11590!4+11587!4-2 |
|
|
10520 |
|
|
11762!4-11759!4+2 |
|
10695 |
|
11814!4+11811!4-2 |
|
|
10748 |
12178!4+12175!4+2 |
|
|
|
11119 |
|
12319!4+12316!4-2 |
|
|
11263 |
|
|
12423!4-12420!4+2 |
|
11370 |
12486!4+12483!4+2 |
|
|
|
11434 |
|
12825!4+12822!4-2 |
|
|
11782 |
|
|
12830!4-12827!4+2 |
|
11787 |
|
13056!4+13053!4-2 |
|
|
12019 |
|
|
|
13416!4-13413!4-2 |
12390 |
|
|
14553!4-14550!4+2 |
|
13568 |
|
|
|
15173!4-15170!4-2 |
14215 |
|
|
|
16929!4-16926!4-2 |
16061 |
17188!4+17185!4+2 |
|
|
|
16335 |
|
|
17340!4-17337!4+2 |
|
16496 |
17682!4+17679!4+2 |
|
|
|
16859 |
17837!4+17834!4+2 |
|
|
|
17024 |
19235!4+19232!4+2 |
|
|
|
18516 |
|
20132!4+20129!4-2 |
|
|
19478 |
21191!4+21188!4+2 |
|
|
|
20621 |
|
|
21280!4-21277!4+2 |
|
20717 |
|
|
|
21631!4-21628!4-2 |
21097 |
|
21847!4+21844!4-2 |
|
|
21331 |
|
|
|
22150!4-22147!4-2 |
21660 |
|
|
22461!4+22458!4−2 |
|
21998 |
|
|
|
23189!4−23186!4−2 |
22792 |
|
|
|
23747!4−23744!4−2 |
23401 |
As with the single factorial versions, the
deviation can basically take any value that divides the modulus, so that we can
consider replacing the 2 in the above forms with 4.
|
|
11353!4-11352!4+4 |
|
10279 |
|
|
11805!4-11804!4+4 |
|
10738 |
|
12410!4+12409!4-4 |
|
|
11356 |
|
|
12620!4-12619!4+4 |
|
11571 |
|
|
12621!4-12620!4+4 |
|
11572 |
|
|
12634!4-12633!4+4 |
|
11586 |
|
12669!4+12668!4-4 |
|
|
11621 |
|
|
|
13078!4-13077!4-4 |
12042 |
|
|
|
14148!4-14147!4-4 |
13148 |
|
|
14337!4-14336!4+4 |
|
13344 |
|
14356!4+14355!4-4 |
|
|
13364 |
|
14431!4+14430!4-4 |
|
|
13442 |
|
14530!4+14529!4-4 |
|
|
13545 |
|
|
|
15528!4-15527!4-4 |
14587 |
|
|
|
16060!4-16059!4-4 |
15145 |
16157!4+16156!4+4 |
|
|
|
15247 |
|
|
|
17473!4−17472!4−4 |
16637 |
|
|
18229!4−18228!4+4 |
|
17441 |
18953!4+18952!4+4 |
|
|
|
18214 |
19427!4+19426!4+4 |
|
|
|
18721 |
|
|
20633!4−20632!4+4 |
|
20018 |
|
20801!4+20800!4−4 |
|
|
20199 |
|
21467!4+21466!4−4 |
|
|
20920 |
|
|
21552!4−21551!4+4 |
|
21012 |
&
|
|
11324!4-11321!4+4 |
|
10250 |
|
11707!4+11704!4-4 |
|
|
10639 |
|
|
|
12174!4-12171!4-4 |
11115 |
|
12730!4+12727!4-4 |
|
|
11684 |
|
|
|
12872!4-12869!4-4 |
11830 |
|
|
13302!4-13299!4+4 |
|
12273 |
13336!4+13333!4+4 |
|
|
|
12308 |
|
13857!4+13854!4-4 |
|
|
12846 |
|
|
|
14080!4-14077!4-4 |
13077 |
|
|
|
14473!4-14470!4-4 |
13485 |
|
|
14488!4-14485!4+4 |
|
13501 |
15618!4+15615!4+4 |
|
|
|
14681 |
|
17219!4+17216!4−4 |
|
|
16368 |
19534!4+19531!4+4 |
|
|
|
18836 |
|
|
19999!4−19996!4+4 |
|
19335 |
|
|
|
20649!4−20646!4−4 |
20035 |
|
21022!4+21019!4−4 |
|
|
20438 |
22113!4+22110!4+4 |
|
|
|
21620 |
|
|
|
22627!4−22624!4−4 |
22179 |
The mod 6 case can be treated similarly.
|
|
|
16831!6-16830!6-2 |
10639 |
|
|
17099!6-17098!6+2 |
|
10828 |
|
18245!6+18244!6-2 |
|
|
11640 |
18440!6+18439!6+2 |
|
|
|
11778 |
18629!6+18628!6+2 |
|
|
|
11913 |
|
19569!6+19568!6-2 |
|
|
12583 |
|
|
|
19898!6-19897!6-2 |
12819 |
21198!6+21197!6+2 |
|
|
|
13753 |
|
|
|
21399!6-21398!6-2 |
13898 |
|
|
21561!6-21560!6+2 |
|
14015 |
|
|
22352!6-22351!6+2 |
|
14588 |
23705!6+23704!6+2 |
|
|
|
15571 |
|
|
|
24257!6-24256!6-2 |
15974 |
|
|
|
25275!6-25274!6-2 |
16720 |
|
|
|
25372!6-25371!6-2 |
16791 |
26189!6+26188!6+2 |
|
|
|
17392 |
|
|
|
28118!6-28117!6-2 |
18817 |
|
|
|
29131!6-29130!6-2 |
19569 |
|
|
|
31103!6−31102!6−2 |
21041 |
|
|
|
34913!6−34912!6−2 |
23911 |
|
|
34943!6−34942!6+2 |
|
23933 |
|
|
|
35033!6−35032!6−2 |
24002 |
|
|
38373!6−38372!6+2 |
|
26543 |
|
39768!6+39767!6−2 |
|
|
27610 |
|
40921!6+40920!6−2 |
|
|
28495 |
|
|
|
41830!6−41829!6−2 |
29195 |
|
|
|
42279!6−42278!6−2 |
29541 |
|
|
|
43016!6−43015!6−2 |
30109 |
|
44813!6+44812!6−2 |
|
|
31500 |
46991!6+46990!6+2 |
|
|
|
33192 |
Divisibility by 3 here follows the m=3 case,
with the single multifactorial form having 1 out of 3
excluded, whereas the twin case has 5 of 12 failing, and there is also more
general divisibility due to the combination effect. This means that there are
less values than one might think that require a full pseudoprimality
test. The n-1
term can be replaced here by n-3
or n-5 to get
combinations will almost identical properties, and the deviation d=2 can be
replaced by d=3, d=4 or d=6.
Finally, we consider the mod 5 case.
|
14504!5+14503!5-1 |
|
|
10815 |
|
|
|
15458!5-15457!5-1 |
11611 |
|
|
16383!5-16382!5+1 |
|
12389 |
17777!5+17776!5+1 |
|
|
|
13569 |
|
|
17952!5-17951!5+1 |
|
13717 |
|
|
|
18070!5-18069!5-1 |
13818 |
|
|
18499!5-18498!5+1 |
|
14184 |
19357!5+19356!5+1 |
|
|
|
14918 |
|
|
19536!5-19535!5+1 |
|
15071 |
19966!5+19965!5+1 |
|
|
|
15440 |
|
|
20352!5-20351!5+1 |
|
15773 |
|
|
|
23560!5-23559!5-1 |
18558 |
23629!5+23628!5+1 |
|
|
|
18618 |
|
|
|
24367!5-24366!5-1 |
19265 |
24971!5+24970!5+1 |
|
|
|
19795 |
25066!5+25065!5+1 |
|
|
|
19879 |
|
26603!5+26602!5−1 |
|
|
21235 |
|
|
28502!5−28501!5+1 |
|
22922 |
34026!5+34025!5+1 |
|
|
|
27887 |
As expected, certain combinations here are automatically
divisible by 5, in this case 11 out of 40 possibles,
the remainder sieved to n / 5 at least. This is actually an improvement over
the mod 3 case, although again we have the problem of a more slowly rising
search limit. For the simplest form n!5±1, out of every
40 possibles there are 20 divisible by 5, so
including an extra term has had a significant impact. As elsewhere, the
built-in sieve itself has also been tightened (that is, the survival rate has
increased) due to the increased likelihood of a prime p<n dividing one or
other of the multifactorials. Adding additional terms
to the combination will improve the automatic sieve and reduce divisibility by
5, but generates too large a search space. We could also consider replacing the
n-1 term with either n-2,
n-3 or n-4 to get
combinations with similar properties.
In the mod 5 case above, we may yet again apply
BLS to prove primality in all cases. However, if we
replace the deviation ±1
by ±5, we get a new
set of numbers that cannot be proved prime by BLS, as
follows.
|
|
|
14281!5-14280!5-5 |
10629 |
|
|
|
15410!5-15409!5-5 |
11571 |
|
|
15851!5-15850!5+5 |
|
11941 |
|
15961!5+15960!5-5 |
|
|
12033 |
|
|
16052!5-16051!5+5 |
|
12110 |
|
|
|
16531!5-16530!5-5 |
12513 |
|
16839!5+16838!5-5 |
|
|
12774 |
|
16864!5+16863!5-5 |
|
|
12795 |
|
17206!5+17205!5-5 |
|
|
13084 |
|
17615!5+17614!5-5 |
|
|
13431 |
|
18075!5+18074!5-5 |
|
|
13822 |
19498!5+19497!5+5 |
|
|
|
15038 |
|
|
|
19560!5−19559!5−5 |
15092 |
19786!5+19785!5+5 |
|
|
|
15286 |
|
20051!5+20050!5−5 |
|
|
15513 |
|
|
|
25390!5−25389!5−5 |
20164 |
|
26012!5+26011!5−5 |
|
|
20713 |
26740!5+26739!5+5 |
|
|
|
21357 |
It can be seen that there is considerable scope
for expanding this search, providing a lucrative source of probable primes.
Last updated: 10/01/2018